Dai 2007 Go Long, Go Deep: Finding Optical Jet Breaks
主要内容:
They observed six bursts' optical late faint afterglows by LBT. And said the jet break is still their, but late.
精彩摘抄:
文章信息:
- arXiv:0712.2239 [ps, pdf, other]
- Title: Go Long, Go Deep: Finding Optical Jet Breaks for Swift-Era GRBs with the LBTAuthors: X. Dai, P. M. Garnavich, J. L. Prieto, K. Z. Stanek, C. S. Kochanek, J. Bechtold, N. Bouche, P. Buschkamp, E. Diolaiti, X. Fan, E. Giallongo, R. Gredel, J. M. Hill, L. Jiang, C. McClellend, P. Milne, F. Pedichini, R. W. Pogge, R. Ragazzoni, J. Rhoads, R. Smareglia, D. Thompson, R. M. WagnerComments: submitted to ApJ Letters, 16 pages, 3 figuresSubjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)
Using the 8.4m Large Binocular Telescope, we observed six GRB afterglows from 2.8 hours to 30.8 days after the burst triggers to systematically probe the late time behaviors of afterglows including jet breaks, flares, and supernova bumps. We detected five afterglows with Sloan r' magnitudes ranging from 23.0--26.3 mag. The depth of our observations allows us to extend the temporal baseline for measuring jet breaks by another decade in time scale. We detected two jet breaks and a third candidate, all of which are not detectable without deep, late time optical observations. In the other three cases, we do not detect the jet breaks either because of contamination from the host galaxy light, the presence of a supernova bump, or the intrinsic faintness of the optical afterglow. This suggests that the basic picture that GRBs are collimated is still valid and that the apparent lack of Swift jet breaks is due to poorly sampled afterglow light curves, particularly at late times.
Labels: 3.2 Opt/infrared, 4.1 jet structure
没有评论:
发表评论