伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期四, 七月 19, 2007

Urata 2007 有一些暴的“正常”阶段也不能用标准余辉模型解释

主要内容:
他们选择“正常”下降阶段的光学和X射线的时间指数(f_nu\propto t^{-alpha}),按照标准模型,(alpha_O-alpha_X)应该在-1/4到5/4之间,但有些却在-1/4以下,说明标准余辉模型不能解释。

不过在文中作者并没有考虑同步自吸收的情形,(即nu_O .lt. nu_a .lt. nu_x, nu_o .lt. nu_m .lt. nu_x的也没有考虑。还是不够全面的。而且如果光学小于同步自吸收的话,光学的指数是负的,x射线是正的,一定可以小于-1/4


精彩摘抄
:
所考虑的几种情形
alpha_O and alpha_X


几个暴的数据

文章信息:

arXiv:0707.2826 [ps, pdf, other]
Title: Testing the External Shock Model of Gamma-Ray Bursts using the Late-Time Simultaneous Optical and X-ray Afterglows
Comments: 12 page, 2 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to ApJL
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)

We study the ``normal'' decay phase of the X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), which follows the shallow decay phase, using the events simultaneously observed in the R-band. The classical external shock model, in which neither the delayed energy injection nor time-dependency of shock micro-physics is considered, shows that the decay indices of the X-ray and R-band light curves, $\alpha_{\rm X}$ and $\alpha_{\rm O}$, obey a certain relation, and that in particular, $\alpha_{\rm O}-\alpha_{\rm X}$ should be larger than -1/4. For our selected 14 samples, we have found that 7 events violate the limit taking into account 1$\sigma$ error, so that a fraction of events are outliers of the classical external shock model at the ``normal'' decay phase.

没有评论: