伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期三, 四月 22, 2009

Sudilovsky 2009 尘埃状MgII的吸收

主要内容:
结论是不重要

精彩摘抄:


文章信息:

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:0904.3227)
· References in the Article
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Dusty MgII Absorbers: Implications for the GRB/Quasar Incidence Discrepancy
Authors:
Sudilovsky, Vladimir
Publication:
eprint arXiv:0904.3227
Publication Date:
04/2009
Origin:
ARXIV
Keywords:
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Comment:
11 pages, 4 figures. ApJ Accepted
Bibliographic Code:
2009arXiv0904.3227S

Abstract

There is nearly a factor of four difference in the number density of intervening MgII absorbers as determined from gamma-ray burst (GRB) and quasar lines of sight. We use a Monte-Carlo simulation to test if a dust extinction bias can account for this discrepancy. We apply an empirically determined relationship between dust column density and MgII rest equivalent width to simulated quasar sight-lines and model the underlying number of quasars that must be present to explain the published magnitude distribution of SDSS quasars. We find that an input MgII number density dn/dz of 0.273 +- 0.002 over the range 0.4 <= z <= 2.0 and with MgII equivalent width W_0 >= 1.0 angstroms accurately reproduces observed distributions. From this value, we conclude that a dust obstruction bias cannot be the sole cause of the observed discrepancy between GRB and quasar sight-lines: this bias is likely to reduce the discrepancy only by ~10%
Bibtex entry for this abstract Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

没有评论: