Xiao 2009 长时延的暴来自附近的猜测不成立
主要内容:
通过对18个长时延的Swift暴的分析, (其中17个的红移大于0.5)认为以前猜测长时延的暴来自本地是不对的, 从而LIGO也不能看到其引力波辐射.
(奇怪的是关于这个结论只需要红移就搞定了, 不知道为什么作者还加了很多别的分析手段如和cluster是否靠近等.)
精彩摘抄:
文章信息:
· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below) - · arXiv e-print (arXiv:0904.2566)
- · References in the Article
- ·
- · Translate This Page
Title: | Are Swift Long-Lag Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Local Supercluster? | |
Authors: | Xiao, Limin; Schaefer, Bradley E. | |
Publication: | eprint arXiv:0904.2566 | |
Publication Date: | 04/2009 | |
Origin: | ARXIV | |
Keywords: | Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics | |
Comment: | 14 pages, 1 figure, ApJ accepted | |
Bibliographic Code: | 2009arXiv0904.2566X |
Abstract
A sample of 18 long-lag (tau_{lag} > 1 s) Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) has been drawn from our catalog of all Swift long GRBs. Four different tests are done on this sample to test the prediction that a large fraction of long-lag GRBs are from our Local Supercluster. The results of these four tests come out that: (1) the distribution of these GRBs shows no tendency towards the Supergalactic plane; (2) the distribution shows no tendency towards the Virgo or Coma Cluster; (3) no associated bright host galaxies (m <=15) in the Local Supercluster are found for any of the 18 GRBs; (4) 17 of these 18 GRBs have redshifts of z>0.5, which are too far to be in the Local Supercluster. All these results disproved the hypothesis that any significant fraction of long-lag GRBs are from Local Supercluster. Hence these long-lag GRBs can not be counted in the calculation of LIGO detection rates. An explanation of why we can detect long-lag GRBs at high redshift is presented.Bibtex entry for this abstract Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)
没有评论:
发表评论