伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期五, 四月 17, 2009

Xiao 2009 长时延的暴来自附近的猜测不成立

主要内容:
通过对18个长时延的Swift暴的分析, (其中17个的红移大于0.5)认为以前猜测长时延的暴来自本地是不对的, 从而LIGO也不能看到其引力波辐射.

(奇怪的是关于这个结论只需要红移就搞定了, 不知道为什么作者还加了很多别的分析手段如和cluster是否靠近等.)

精彩摘抄:


文章信息:

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:0904.2566)
· References in the Article
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Are Swift Long-Lag Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Local Supercluster?
Authors:
Xiao, Limin; Schaefer, Bradley E.
Publication:
eprint arXiv:0904.2566
Publication Date:
04/2009
Origin:
ARXIV
Keywords:
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
Comment:
14 pages, 1 figure, ApJ accepted
Bibliographic Code:
2009arXiv0904.2566X

Abstract

A sample of 18 long-lag (tau_{lag} > 1 s) Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) has been drawn from our catalog of all Swift long GRBs. Four different tests are done on this sample to test the prediction that a large fraction of long-lag GRBs are from our Local Supercluster. The results of these four tests come out that: (1) the distribution of these GRBs shows no tendency towards the Supergalactic plane; (2) the distribution shows no tendency towards the Virgo or Coma Cluster; (3) no associated bright host galaxies (m <=15) in the Local Supercluster are found for any of the 18 GRBs; (4) 17 of these 18 GRBs have redshifts of z>0.5, which are too far to be in the Local Supercluster. All these results disproved the hypothesis that any significant fraction of long-lag GRBs are from Local Supercluster. Hence these long-lag GRBs can not be counted in the calculation of LIGO detection rates. An explanation of why we can detect long-lag GRBs at high redshift is presented.
Bibtex entry for this abstract Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

没有评论: