伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期一, 五月 02, 2011

Shao 2011 某些短暴可能实际上是长暴

主要内容:
主要从余辉的光变曲线上看。

精彩摘抄:


文章信息:

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:1104.5498)
· References in the Article
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Implications for Understanding Short Gamma-Ray Bursts Detected by {\it Swift}
Authors:
Shao, Lang; Dai, Zi-Gao; Fan, Yi-Zhong; Zhang, Fu-Wen; Jin, Zhi-Ping; Wei, Da-Ming
Publication:
eprint arXiv:1104.5498
Publication Date:
04/2011
Origin:
ARXIV
Keywords:
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
Comment:
10 pages, 5 figues, 2 tables
Bibliographic Code:
2011arXiv1104.5498S

Abstract

In an effort to understand the puzzle of classifying Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), we have a systematic study of {\it Swift} GRBs and investigate several issues on short GRBs. Though short GRBs have a short ($\lesssim2$ s) prompt duration as monitored by {\it Swift} Burst Alert Telescope (BAT), the composite light curves including both the prompt and afterglow emission suggest that most of them have a similar radiative feature as the long GRBs. Besides, some well-studied short GRBs might also have an intrinsically long prompt duration, which renders them a type of short GRB imposters. Genuine short GRBs might be rare so that to discriminate the observed short GRBs is, not surprisingly, troublesome. In particular, the observational biases in the host identification and redshift measurement of GRBs should be taken with great caution. The redshift distribution which has been proposed to be different for long and short GRBs might have been strongly affected by the measurement methods.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

没有评论: