伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期四, 十月 21, 2010

Schady, P. 2010 通过余辉的谱探测宿主星系的环境

主要内容:


精彩摘抄:


文章信息:

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:1010.2034)
· References in the Article
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
The missing gas problem in GRB host galaxies: evidence for a highly ionised component
Authors:
Schady, P.; Savaglio, S.; Kruehler, T.; Greiner, J.; Rau, A.
Publication:
eprint arXiv:1010.2034
Publication Date:
10/2010
Origin:
ARXIV
Keywords:
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
Comment:
10 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Bibliographic Code:
2010arXiv1010.2034S

Abstract

There is considerable discrepancy between the amount of X-ray absorption and that inferred from optical (rest frame UV) as measured along gamma-ray burst (GRB) sight lines, with the former being typically an order of magnitude higher than what would be expected from the measurement of neutral element species via optical absorption line spectroscopy. We explore this "missing gas problem" by using X-ray and optical measurements in a sample of 29 z=0.7-6.3 GRBs from both spectroscopic data and the afterglow broadband spectral energy distributions. The low ionisation species detected in the UV are associated with the neutral interstellar medium in the GRB host galaxy, while soft X-ray absorption, which is weakly dependent on the ionisation state of the gas, provides a probe of the total column of gas along the sight line. After careful consideration of any systematic effects, we find that the neutral gas consists of less than ~10% of the total gas, and this limit decreases with the more ionised that the X-ray absorbing gas is, which in our spectral fits is assumed to be neutral. Only a very small fraction of this ionised gas, however, is detected in UV absorption lines with ionisation potentials up to ~200eV (i.e. SiIV, CIV, NV, OVI), which leaves us to postulate that the X-ray excess is due to ultra-highly-ionised, dense gas in the GRB vicinity.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

没有评论: