伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期日, 八月 22, 2010

de Ugarte Postigo 2010 寻找Swift暴的中间类型

主要内容:
基于他们认为伽马暴分为三类,还有一个中间类的假定,找这个第三类。

精彩摘抄:
这里给出了他们认为这第三类和普通长暴的区别: We suggest that the physical difference between intermediate and long bursts could be that for the first the ejecta are thin shells while for the latter they are thick shells.




文章信息:



· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:1006.4469)
· References in the Article
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Searching for differences in Swift's intermediate GRBs
Authors:
de Ugarte Postigo, A.; Horváth, I.; Veres, P.; Bagoly, Z.; Kann, D. A.; Thöne, C. C.; Balazs, L. G.; D'Avanzo, P.; Aloy, M. A.; Foley, S.; Campana, S.; Mao, J.; Jakobsson, P.; Covino, S.; Fynbo, J. P. U.; Gorosabel, J.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Amati, L.; Nardini, M.
Publication:
eprint arXiv:1006.4469
Publication Date:
06/2010
Origin:
ARXIV
Keywords:
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Comment:
Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics. 16 pages, 17 figures, 5 tables
Bibliographic Code:
2010arXiv1006.4469D

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts are usually classified through their high-energy emission into short-duration and long-duration bursts, which presumably reflect two different types of progenitors. However, it has been shown on statistical grounds that a third, intermediate population is needed in this classification scheme, although an extensive study of the properties of this class has so far not been done. The large amount of follow-up studies generated during the Swift era allows us to have a suficient sample to attempt a study of this third population through the properties of their prompt emission and their afterglows. Our study is focused on a sample of GRBs observed by Swift during its first four years of operation. The sample contains those bursts with measured redshift since this allows us to derive intrinsic properties. Intermediate bursts are less energetic and have dimmer afterglows than long GRBs, especially when considering the X-ray light curves, which are on average one order of magnitude fainter than long bursts. There is a less significant trend in the redshift distribution that places intermediate bursts closer than long bursts. Except for this, intermediate bursts show similar properties to long bursts. In particular, they follow the Epeak vs. Eiso correlation and have, on average, positive spectral lags with a distribution similar to that of long bursts. Like long GRBs, they normally have an associated supernova, although some intermediate bursts have shown no supernova component. This study shows that intermediate bursts are different from short bursts and, in spite of sharing many properties with long bursts, there are some differences between them as well. We suggest that the physical difference between intermediate and long bursts could be that for the first the ejecta are thin shells while for the latter they are thick shells.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

没有评论: