伽玛暴(Gamma-Ray Burst)笔记。记录有关伽玛暴的新文章,另外也包括看的老文章、自己的想法、以及跟天文相关的一些东西。 Feel free to leave me a message by comments or by email.

星期六, 九月 18, 2010

Metzger 2010 伽马暴中央引擎:黑洞还是磁星?

主要内容:
一个会议邀请综述。

精彩摘抄:


文章信息:

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:1001.5046)
· References in the Article
· Citations to the Article (3) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Gamma-Ray Burst Central Engines: Black Hole Vs. Magnetar
Authors:
Metzger, B. D.
Publication:
eprint arXiv:1001.5046
Publication Date:
01/2010
Origin:
ARXIV
Keywords:
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Comment:
15 pages, 4 figures, 1 table; Invited Review, to appear in the ASP conference proceedings of the "Frank N. Bash Symposium 2009: New Horizons in Astronomy", eds. L. Stanford, L. Hao, Y. Mao, J. Green
Bibliographic Code:
2010arXiv1001.5046M

Abstract

Discovered over forty years ago, Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) remain a forefront topic in modern astrophysics. Perhaps the most fundamental question associated with GRBs is the nature of the astrophysical agent (or agents) that ultimately powers them: the central engine. In this review, I focus on the possible central engines of long-duration GRBs, and the constraints that present observations place on these models. Long GRBs are definitively associated with the deaths of massive stars, but whether the central engine is an accreting black hole or a rapidly-spinning, highly-magnetized neutron star (a "proto-magnetar") remains unsettled. This distinction has been brought into particular focus by recent MHD simulations of the core-collapse of massive, rotating "collapsar progenitors," which suggest that powerful magneto-centrifugal outflows from the proto-neutron star may stave off black hole formation entirely. Although both black hole and magnetar GRB models remain viable, I argue that the magnetar model is more mature in the sense that it provides quantitative explanations for the durations, energies, Lorentz factors, and collimation of long GRB outflows. Given these virtues, one promising strategy to break the present stalemate is to further develop the magnetar model until inescapable (and falsifiable) predictions emerge. This course of action signals a renewed challenge to translate time-dependent jet properties (power, magnetization, and Lorentz factor) into observables (gamma-ray light curves and spectra).
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

没有评论: